New search

City comparison

Chicago, IL vs Bakersfield, CA

Chicago, IL versus Bakersfield, CA is a real move, not a trivia matchup. This comparison uses the same 2026 neighborhood report data we publish on each city page — typical rent, median household income, crime indexes, school composites, and typical weather — so you can see which city actually fits how you live, work, and spend. Typical rents sit near $1,440 a month in Chicago and $1,472 in Bakersfield, and median household income lands at $77,902 versus $80,540. Open either city's full report when you want the block-level detail behind these headlines.

Chicago takes affordability and weather, while Bakersfield takes job market and safety. The widest gap is crime index, where Bakersfield leads by 63% — the kind of spread you feel in a monthly budget or a nightly walk, not just on a chart. Read the category rows as a filter: if cheaper housing would change your life more than a stronger job market, weight rent first. If you are moving with kids, weight schools and crime. If you picked a city after one good weekend, use the weather and income rows to test whether that weekend survives a full year.

Numbers below are citywide, not a guarantee about the street you will actually live on. Two ZIP codes in Chicago can feel further apart than Chicago and Bakersfield do on paper. Use this page to pick a city, then use the Chicago and Bakersfield reports to pick a neighborhood — and visit in the season you like least before you sign anything.

Chicago, IL

Rent
$1,440/mo
Median income
$77,902
Crime index
86
Schools
A-
Weather
69°F

Bakersfield, CA

Rent
$1,472/mo
Median income
$80,540
Crime index
32
Schools
A-
Weather
86°F

Rent

2% cheaper

Chicago rent is 2% cheaper than Bakersfield

Chicago

Winner

$1,440/mo

Bakersfield

$1,472/mo

What this means for your life

Typical rent runs $1,440 a month in Chicago versus $1,472 in Bakersfield, so Chicago is 2% cheaper. The monthly spread is about $32, or $384 a year — noticeable, but rent alone should not pick the city. Use this as a tie-breaker after you compare income, schools, and crime, unless you are already stretching every dollar.

Median income

3% higher

Bakersfield's median income is 3% higher than Chicago

Chicago

$77,902

Bakersfield

Winner

$80,540

What this means for your life

Median household income is $80,540 in Bakersfield versus $77,902 in Chicago, so typical pay runs 3% higher in Bakersfield — about $2,638 more household income a year. The income edge is modest. Treat it as extra negotiating context, not a reason to ignore rent, schools, or climate. Remote workers especially should not treat citywide pay as a personal raise if their employer will not localize salary.

Crime index

63% lower crime

Bakersfield's crime index is 63% lower than Chicago

Chicago

86 (100 = avg)

Bakersfield

Winner

32 (100 = avg)

What this means for your life

Bakersfield's crime index is 32 versus 86 in Chicago (100 = national average), so citywide crime runs 63% lower in Bakersfield. That gap is meaningful day-to-day — it affects whether you feel comfortable walking at night, leaving your car on the street, or letting kids play outside unsupervised. Indexes still compress a lot of reality: a calmer city has blocks you would skip, and a higher-crime city has streets that feel neighborly at 10 p.m. On the everyday test of walking from the car to the door, Bakersfield is the easier city. Chicago can still work if you pick the right pocket — just budget more diligence before you sign a lease.

School scores

Neck and neck

Chicago and Bakersfield are about even on school scores.

Chicago

A- · 84/100

Bakersfield

A- · 84/100

What this means for your life

School composites are effectively even (A- in Chicago, A- in Bakersfield). For families with kids this is a warning if you assumed one city was obviously better — at this range the campus, not the city name, decides it. Tour the zoned elementary you would actually use.

Typical weather

63% more comfortable

Chicago weather is 63% more comfortable than Bakersfield

Chicago

Winner

69°F typical

Bakersfield

86°F typical

What this means for your life

Chicago scores 63% more comfortable on this page's weather index, which rewards temperatures closer to a livable outdoor day. Typical temperatures sit around 69°F in Chicago and 86°F in Bakersfield. Chicago reads as mild, livable temperatures; Bakersfield reads as hot, long summers. Climate affects quality of life more than most people anticipate when planning a move. Consider how much time you spend outdoors and whether extreme heat or cold impacts your mood or productivity. Chicago is the better default if you want year-round outdoor access. Bakersfield can still be right if you love that climate on purpose — beach heat, dry heat, or a real winter — but you cannot return a city's weather.

Fit check

Who should choose Chicago

Outdoor enthusiasts and people who need year-round access to nature for their wellbeing

Chicago is the clearer landing pad if housing cost is what keeps you up at night. Typical rent is 2% cheaper here at about $1,440 a month. Choose Chicago if you are stretching a salary, starting over, or want slack for travel and debt instead of a flashier skyline.

Pick Chicago if you are an outdoor enthusiast or you need year-round access to nature for your wellbeing. Typical conditions (69°F) beat Bakersfield on this page's weather index by 63%. Bakersfield may pay more or cost less, but Chicago is the city where the forecast fights you less.

Open the Chicago report →

Fit check

Who should choose Bakersfield

Career-focused movers who want salary upside and professional growth

Bakersfield is the better city for career-focused movers who want salary upside and professional growth. Median household income is 3% higher here ($80,540). Start with Bakersfield if your next chapter is about building earnings, and make weather or nightlife a secondary screen.

Bakersfield is the better fit for families with young children and retirees who prioritize peace of mind over urban energy. The crime index is 63% lower than Chicago (32 vs a 100 national average). That gap shows up in how freely you walk at night and how much attention you spend on the car and the deadbolt.

Open the Bakersfield report →

Bottom line

Chicago vs Bakersfield, called

If safety is your priority, Bakersfield is the clear choice.

If weather matters more to you, Chicago pulls ahead.

For most movers comparing these two cities, Chicago offers the better overall package.

Common questions

Chicago vs Bakersfield FAQ

Is Chicago cheaper than Bakersfield?
Yes. Typical rent in Chicago is $1,440 a month versus $1,472 in Bakersfield — 2% cheaper. Median household income is $77,902 in Chicago compared with $80,540 in Bakersfield, so Bakersfield has the stronger local pay picture.
Which city is safer, Chicago or Bakersfield?
Bakersfield is safer on this comparison. Its crime index is 32 versus 86 in Chicago — 63% lower (100 is the national average). Citywide indexes still hide neighborhood variation, so walk the block you would actually rent.
Which city has better schools, Chicago or Bakersfield?
School composites are close: A- in Chicago and A- in Bakersfield. Tour specific campuses rather than picking a city on the letter grade alone.

Ready to move to Chicago?

Keep researching

Explore more comparisons