New search

City comparison

San Francisco, CA vs St Paul, MN

San Francisco, CA versus St Paul, MN is a real move, not a trivia matchup. This comparison uses the same 2026 neighborhood report data we publish on each city page โ€” typical rent, median household income, crime indexes, school composites, and typical weather โ€” so you can see which city actually fits how you live, work, and spend. Typical rents sit near $3,604 a month in San Francisco and $1,232 in St Paul, and median household income lands at $136,689 versus $72,400. Open either city's full report when you want the block-level detail behind these headlines.

San Francisco takes job market and weather, while St Paul takes affordability and safety. The widest gap is median income, where San Francisco leads by 89% โ€” the kind of spread you feel in a monthly budget or a nightly walk, not just on a chart. Read the category rows as a filter: if cheaper housing would change your life more than a stronger job market, weight rent first. If you are moving with kids, weight schools and crime. If you picked a city after one good weekend, use the weather and income rows to test whether that weekend survives a full year.

Numbers below are citywide, not a guarantee about the street you will actually live on. Two ZIP codes in San Francisco can feel further apart than San Francisco and St Paul do on paper. Use this page to pick a city, then use the San Francisco and St Paul reports to pick a neighborhood โ€” and visit in the season you like least before you sign anything.

San Francisco, CA

Rent
$3,604/mo
Median income
$136,689
Crime index
122
Schools
A-
Weather
65ยฐF

St Paul, MN

Rent
$1,232/mo
Median income
$72,400
Crime index
78
Schools
A-
Weather
โ€”

Rent

66% cheaper

St Paul rent is 66% cheaper than San Francisco

San Francisco

$3,604/mo

St Paul

Winner

$1,232/mo

What this means for your life

Typical rent runs $1,232 a month in St Paul versus $3,604 in San Francisco, so St Paul is 66% cheaper. That's roughly $2,372/month back in your pocket โ€” $28,464/year. Over five years that's $142,320 you could redirect toward a down payment, travel, or investments. Housing is the bill you pay before groceries, childcare, or a social life, so that gap shows up in how often you eat out and how panicked a rent hike feels. If you already have a high-paying offer in San Francisco, the extra rent can be rational. If you do not, St Paul is the easier city to land in without blowing up your budget.

Median income

89% higher

San Francisco's median income is 89% higher than St Paul

San Francisco

Winner

$136,689

St Paul

$72,400

What this means for your life

Median household income is $136,689 in San Francisco versus $72,400 in St Paul, so typical pay runs 89% higher in San Francisco โ€” about $64,289 more household income a year. Higher median income usually signals a stronger local job market and better negotiating leverage on salary. Remote workers should weigh this against cost of living rather than treating it as a direct personal benefit. For people who will actually work in town, San Francisco is the stronger labor market on paper. St Paul can still win if housing is cheap enough to offset the weaker median or if your specific role already pays well there.

Crime index

36% lower crime

St Paul's crime index is 36% lower than San Francisco

San Francisco

122 (100 = avg)

St Paul

Winner

78 (100 = avg)

What this means for your life

St Paul's crime index is 78 versus 122 in San Francisco (100 = national average), so citywide crime runs 36% lower in St Paul. That gap is meaningful day-to-day โ€” it affects whether you feel comfortable walking at night, leaving your car on the street, or letting kids play outside unsupervised. Indexes still compress a lot of reality: a calmer city has blocks you would skip, and a higher-crime city has streets that feel neighborly at 10 p.m. On the everyday test of walking from the car to the door, St Paul is the easier city. San Francisco can still work if you pick the right pocket โ€” just budget more diligence before you sign a lease.

School scores

Neck and neck

San Francisco and St Paul are about even on school scores.

San Francisco

A- ยท 84/100

St Paul

A- ยท 84/100

What this means for your life

School composites are effectively even (A- in San Francisco, A- in St Paul). For families with kids this is a warning if you assumed one city was obviously better โ€” at this range the campus, not the city name, decides it. Tour the zoned elementary you would actually use.

Typical weather

69% more comfortable

San Francisco weather is 69% more comfortable than St Paul

San Francisco

Winner

65ยฐF typical

St Paul

Comfort 52/100

What this means for your life

San Francisco scores 69% more comfortable on this page's weather index, which rewards temperatures closer to a livable outdoor day. San Francisco reads as mild, livable temperatures; St Paul reads as a mixed climate. Climate affects quality of life more than most people anticipate when planning a move. Consider how much time you spend outdoors and whether extreme heat or cold impacts your mood or productivity. San Francisco is the better default if you want year-round outdoor access. St Paul can still be right if you love that climate on purpose โ€” beach heat, dry heat, or a real winter โ€” but you cannot return a city's weather.

Fit check

Who should choose San Francisco

Career-focused movers who want salary upside plus year-round outdoor access

It is also a match for career-focused movers who want salary upside and year-round outdoor access. Median household income runs 89% higher ($136,689), and typical weather is the more comfortable of the two โ€” around 65ยฐF. That pairing is for people who will work hard and then actually use the evenings.

Open the San Francisco report โ†’

Fit check

Who should choose St Paul

Families with young children and retirees who prioritize peace of mind over urban energy

St Paul is the clearer landing pad if housing cost is what keeps you up at night. Typical rent is 66% cheaper here at about $1,232 a month. Choose St Paul if you are stretching a salary, starting over, or want slack for travel and debt instead of a flashier skyline.

St Paul is the better fit for families with young children and retirees who prioritize peace of mind over urban energy. The crime index is 36% lower than San Francisco (78 vs a 100 national average). That gap shows up in how freely you walk at night and how much attention you spend on the car and the deadbolt.

Open the St Paul report โ†’

Bottom line

San Francisco vs St Paul, called

If the job market is your priority, San Francisco is the clear choice.

If cost of living matters more to you, St Paul pulls ahead.

For most movers comparing these two cities, St Paul offers the better overall package.

Common questions

San Francisco vs St Paul FAQ

Is San Francisco cheaper than St Paul?
No. St Paul is cheaper: typical rent is $1,232 a month versus $3,604 in San Francisco โ€” 66% lower. Median household income is $136,689 in San Francisco compared with $72,400 in St Paul, so San Francisco has the stronger local pay picture.
Which city is safer, San Francisco or St Paul?
St Paul is safer on this comparison. Its crime index is 78 versus 122 in San Francisco โ€” 36% lower (100 is the national average). Citywide indexes still hide neighborhood variation, so walk the block you would actually rent.
Which city has better schools, San Francisco or St Paul?
School composites are close: A- in San Francisco and A- in St Paul. Tour specific campuses rather than picking a city on the letter grade alone.

Ready to move to St Paul?

Keep researching

Explore more comparisons